Determination of Gender by the Anthropometric Measurement of Human Mandible Using Ramus Breadth and Mandibular Angle: A Cross Sectional Study from South India

Main Article Content

Vinay Gurushanthappa
Mangala Gowri Shamnur Rajashekarappa

Abstract

Background:


Determination of gender of an individual from human skeletal remains is the first and arguably the most important step encountered by both forensic experts and archaeologists. Assessment by metrical methods over simple morphological observations is quite difficult. The mandible is the strongest and hardest facial bone and retains its shape better than other bones. The main objective of the present study was to measure, compare, and evaluate the various measurements of ramus breadth and mandibular angle to assess the usefulness in gender determination.


Methods:


The study was carried out on 220 dry, complete, undamaged human adult mandibles of unknown gender collected various medical colleges in and around Bangalore. Minimum ramus breadth, maximum ramus breadth and mandibular angle were measured using mandibulometer and sliding caliper.


Results:


After obtaining all the measurements, t test was performed. It was found that if the value of minimum ramus breadth ≥ 3.79 cm it could be considered as male and if the value is ≤ 2.36 cm it is of female. For maximum ramus breadth ≥ 4.85 cm it could be considered as male and if the value is ≤ 3.21 cm it is of female.


Conclusion:


Minimum ramus breadth and maximum ramus breadth are highly predictive for the gender of unknown mandible. The present study shows that the mandible is an important bone in the determination of gender with high accuracy.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gurushanthappa, V., & Gowri Shamnur Rajashekarappa, M. (2013). Determination of Gender by the Anthropometric Measurement of Human Mandible Using Ramus Breadth and Mandibular Angle: A Cross Sectional Study from South India. Medical Science, 1(2), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.29387/ms.2013.1.2.28-32
Section
Original Articles
Author Biographies

Vinay Gurushanthappa, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & R.I, Puducherry, India

MBBS, MD, Asst. Prof.  Anatomy

Mangala Gowri Shamnur Rajashekarappa, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & R.I, Puducherry, India

MBBS, MD, Asst. Prof.  Physiology

References

Saini V, Srivastava R, Rai RK, Shamal SN, Singh TB, Tripathi SK. Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex in fragmentary mandible. J Forensic Sci 2011;56(Suppl1):S13-6.

Scheuer L. Application of osteology to forensic medicine. ClinAnat 2002;15:297-312.

Trancho GJ, Robledo B, Lopez-Bueis I, Sanchez JA. Sexual determination of the femur using discriminant functions: Analysis of a Spanish population of known sex and age. J Forensic Sci 1997; 42(2):181-185.

Hu KS, Koh KS, Han SH, Shin KJ, Kim HJ. Sex determination using nonmetric characteristics of the mandible in Koreans. J Forensic Sci. 2006;51(6):1376-82.

Stewart TD. Medico-legal aspects of the skeleton. Am J phys Anthropol 1948; 6:315-321.

Krogman WM. The human skeleton in legal medicine and medical aspects. In: Levingson SA, editor. In symposium on medical problems. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1949.p.1-92.

Reddy KSN. Identification. The essentials of forensic medicine and toxicology.24th ed. Hyderabad. K Suguna Devi: 2005. p. 79-81.

Indira AP, Markande A, David MP. Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex determination - A digital radiographic study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012;4(2):58-62.

Rosa AM, Reimers E G, Fregel R, zquez VJ, Darias DT, Gonza´lez MA, Larruga JM. Canary islands aborigin sex determination based on mandible parameters contrasted by amelogenin analysis Journal of Archaeological Science (2006) 1-8.

Kumar MP, Lokanadham S. Sex determination & morphometric parameters of human mandible. Int J Res Med Sci. 2013 May;1(2):93-96.

Prajapati VP, Malukar O, Nagar SK. variations in the morphological appearance of the coronoid process of human mandible. Natl J Med Res. 2011; 1(2): 64-66.

Shamout A R, Ammoush M, Alrbata R, Habahbah AA. Age and gender differences in gonial angle, ramus height and bigonial width in dentate subjects. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal 2012;32(1):81-87.

Baydaş B, Yavuz I, Dağsuyu IM, Bölükbaşi B, Ceylan I.An investigation of maxillary and mandibular morphology in different overjet groups. Aust Orthod J. 2004;20(1):11-8.

Ranganath vallabhajosyula, Yogitha Ravindranath, Roopa Ravindranath. Sexual dimorphism in mandibular morphology: a study on South Indian sample. South Asian Anthropologist 2008; 8(1):9-11.

Ongkana N, Sudwan P, Gender difference in Thai mandibles using metric analysis. Chiang Mai Med J 2009;48(2):43-48.

Flossie Jayakaran, Sayee Rajangam, Janakiram S, Thomas IM. Sexing of the mandible. Anatomica Karnataka 2000; 1(1):11–16.